People often assume that group life insurance provided through an employer is a dependable, long-term source of coverage. In practice, few consumers understand the pitfalls built into these employer-sponsored plans. The case below looks at a recent client situation where relying on employer coverage became detrimental to long-term life insurance planning. The comparison below outlines the pros and cons of life insurance obtained through an employer.
| Pros | Cons |
|
|
Case Background
A male client, currently age 54, has a need for $1.5 million in life insurance coverage through age 65. At age 35, he purchased a $900,000, 20-year term policy and enrolled in $600,000 of supplemental life insurance through his employer, at an annual cost of about $312 in year one. Together, the two policies provided the full $1.5 million of coverage he needed at the time.
Nineteen years later, with only one year remaining on his 20-year term policy, he must now purchase a new 10-year policy to bridge the coverage gap to age 65. Compounding the issue, the client recently lost his job — and with it, his $600,000 of employer-sponsored group life coverage. He now needs to replace both the $600,000 group policy and the $900,000 personal policy expiring next year, in order to maintain the coverage necessary to reach his retirement goal at age 65.
Since age 35, the client has also developed sleep apnea and Type II diabetes, and has suffered a cardiac event that led to a stent placement — health changes that will materially affect his insurability and premium costs going forward.
Replacing the full $1.5 million today, with these new health conditions on record, now costs between $8,561 and $15,575 a year depending on carrier and underwriting outcome. Had the client instead secured a single $1.5 million, 30-year term policy at age 35 — when he was healthy and coverage was inexpensive — the annual cost would have been approximately $1,010, locked in for the full 30 years.
The Takeaway
Group coverage that looks like a built-in benefit at 35 can quietly become a liability at 54. Splitting coverage across an employer plan and a shorter personal term left this client exposed to both a job change and an expiration date at the same time — and re-qualifying now, with new health conditions, costs roughly 9 to 15 times what a single, properly termed policy would have cost had it been locked in from the start.
Why Employer Coverage Often Costs More in the Long Run
Employer group life insurance is marketed as a convenience: low cost, no medical exam, a few dollars deducted from every paycheck. For a healthy employee in their thirties, that looks like an easy way to check the life insurance box. But group coverage is built to be temporary, priced accordingly, and it carries limitations most employees never read past the enrollment form:
- Lack of portability. Coverage typically stops the day you quit, get laid off, or retire. Converting it to an individual plan afterward is usually available only at a steep price.1
- Low coverage amounts. Basic employer plans typically pay just one to two times annual salary — well short of the 15 to 30 times income most families actually need to stay protected.2
- Job dependency. The employer owns the policy and can change or drop the plan entirely at any time, with no input from the employees who rely on it.3
- Rising supplemental costs. Extra coverage purchased through work gets more expensive every five years as you age, and younger, healthier employees routinely overpay compared to a private term policy locked in early.2
- Tax exposure. The IRS treats the value of employer-provided group coverage above $50,000 as imputed income, adding a quiet tax cost most employees never notice on their pay stub.1
- Limited customization. A basic group policy cannot be enhanced with personal riders such as long-term care or accelerated death benefits, options individually owned policies routinely offer.2
A personally owned policy avoids each of these pitfalls: it locks in a rate while you’re healthiest, stays in force regardless of employment changes, and is fully portable from job to job and into retirement. The modest premium difference in year one is the cost of certainty — and, as this case shows, certainty is worth far more than a few dollars a paycheck once real life happens.
Sources: 1. Western & Southern Financial Group, “Employer vs. Individual Life Insurance” • 2. CNBC Select, “Open Enrollment: Why Your Employer’s Life Insurance Plan Isn’t Enough” • 3. Alumni Insurance Program, “Life Insurance From Your Employer” • The Law Offices of Jason Turchin, “The Positives and Negatives of Employer Provided Life Insurance.” Provided for general education; consult a licensed advisor for guidance specific to your situation.